What is Collective Efficacy Theory (CET) as
Sampson and colleagues define it?
Collective
efficacy theory is, as Sampson and his colleagues define, “social cohesion” and
“shared expectations for control”. What I think this means is the unity of a
group with similar interests and “expectations” of how things should operate.
What is the evidence that you found in the
international (or non-Chicago at least) study that you read?
The
study I used is one that was conducted in Denmark and reduced down to women in
the health care professional field. The study simply supports their hypothesis
that a work environment with high collective efficacy will have lower numbers
of intentions to leave among the employees in the female health care profession,
Jensen J.N., Holten A. J .N. , -L. , Karpatschof B. & Albertsen
K. (2011). Sampson mentions that
collective efficacy impact other things like obesity, teen pregnancy, etc. so
it is not surprising to find other support for collective efficacy positively
influencing other relationships. In the article I found collective efficacy is
referred to as a mutual “perspective” of their competencies as taken from (Bandura,
1997). So again, perception is a big part of having collective efficacy by both
definitions. Below I will use the words “appearance” and “visual” in explanations
of reactions. Visual cues and appearances leading to assumptions impact
personal actions on a minute to minute basis. Collective efficacy is determined
by these assumptions or perspectives. Sampson also mentioned the word “action”
in this chapter which I am hoping he returns to elaborate on with an action
plan of his own from his research.
And how would you answer the questions that
Sampson gave his respondents, asking about what they thought their neighbors
would do in various situations, only with respect to your own neighborhood?
1)
Children skipping school: I feel that the neighborhood I live
in would do nothing about children skipping school. If it persisted I could see
individuals in my neighborhood saying something to the children asking them why
they weren’t in school but most likely nothing past that. If there were
children hanging on the corner I would imagine that my neighborhood would
inform the police depending on the “visual type” of crowd. Personally I work
with youth but I also know how many children are home-schooled in today’s
society so I would probably do nothing but inquire as well.
2)
Graffiti: Depending on the “appearance” of the individual(s)
doing the spray painting I think my neighborhood and me included would either
chase after them yelling at them to stop and start behaving or call the police
on them and follow up by getting cleaner/paint supplies to restore the building
to its original appearance.
3)
Disrespect: More often than not in today’s society you can
witness children disrespecting adults in public. People in my neighborhood
would most likely look toward the ground and shake their heads in disgust. I
personally would approach the adult and ask them why they allow the child to
treat them in such a disrespectful way. Depending on the adult’s response I
would follow by either ignoring their stupid response or attempt to educate
them on appropriate ways to alter the situation and not allow such disrespect
to take place.
4)
Fight: I would assume that no matter what type of individuals
were involved the people in my neighborhood would just notify the police in a
situation where a fight broke out in front of their home. The individuals in my
neighborhood are mostly elderly and confrontations and/or ability to handle a
physical situation is extremely limited. Personally it would depend on the “appearance”
of the individuals engaged in the dispute for me to determine if I were to
engage in and attempted resolution procedure or just call the police.
5)
Fire/budget cuts: I would like to think that my neighborhood
would commune and gather resources to assist in funding/operating the fire
station if budget cuts were the cause of closure. I would volunteer some
personal time in assisting with operation if budget cuts impacted the operation
of the fire station.
JENSEN J.N., HOLTEN A. J .N. , -L. , KARPATSCHOF B. & ALBERTSEN K. (2011) Does
collective efficacy moderate the associations between physical work load and
intention to leave or sickness absence? Journal of Advanced Nursing 67(11), 2425–
2434. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05674.x
Good definition of CET. It was short and to the point and I drew off of the same two mechanisms of social cohesion and shared expectations mostly because it seemed to be the most clear cut explanation of collective efficacy in that chapter for me. I also liked the comment from your article about the visual cues and assumptions that effect the actions of people and therefore effect the collective efficacy. Good blog it helped me with my understanding of the chapter more.
ReplyDeleteI overlooked all of the questions Sampson asked and really appreciate your answers. I live in an area where if school age were skipping school the neighbors would definitely call the parents or the police. I enjoyed reading your post.
ReplyDeleteMy community is also similar to yours. However, I feel social cohesion could be greatly improved by taking time to reach out and show children and parents how to take responsibility and do what one needs to do instead of what one wants to do!
ReplyDeleteMy community is also similar to yours. However, I feel social cohesion could be greatly improved by taking time to reach out and show children and parents how to take responsibility and do what one needs to do instead of what one wants to do!
ReplyDelete