You've read Sampson on
mobility and division in Chicago. So, drawing on and integrating your two
emphasis areas, how would you answer these two questions: Why do people chose
to move to different neighborhoods?
My two emphasis fields are business and
criminal justice. From a business stand point people move from one place to
another to find jobs that pay more than their current job. In a sense Sampson
is agreeing with this. Sampson states that homeownership reduces the likelihood
that an individual will move but he also states that people tend to relocate to
an area very similar to their existing area (with the exception of blacks
moving to more diverse communities). The text states that the majority of
people who move do not change SES nor do they do so because of individual
choices. So back to my business reasoning, people moving to find jobs is
possible depending on their current circumstances and ethnicity (according to
the text) but really not just to find a job. From a criminal justice perspective
people relocate to increase their feeling of being safe (lower crime rates).
Sampson supports this statement a little by saying that blacks exposed to
violence and whites with depression are more likely to relocate. Depression can
be caused from many different things but seeing crime all around could be one
cause, therefore, crime rate increases cause relocation increases. Sampson also
states that blacks relocate more due to their collective perception of
disorder.
How likely is it that
their individual choices will transform the communities they leave or enter?
According to Sampson, individual choices will have extremely minor (if any at
all) effect on the communities they leave or enter unless that individual is
tied to a big event changer. What I mean is if the person decides to bomb (my criminal justice emphasis) an
important building causing a huge disruption in the norm then that neighborhood
or community may change drastically. On the flip side, someone could have ties
with a big (and successful) business that drastically changes the community (my business emphasis).
These are few and far between but it is possible according to Sampson.
I agree with your answer to the last question. Even though individuals on average do not effectively change communities, individuals with "big event changers" can change communities. But what seems to be the most important idea is that collectively communities and neighborhoods can be changed for the better, but it takes a collective effort. Sounds easy, but I am sure it is extremely hard if not impossible.
ReplyDeleteDavid, I think you nailed this blog assignment. You really did a great job bringing in your emphases areas. Business and the job concept really does tie into why people would change neighborhoods. Also, criminal justice concepts have a strong impact into people moving in and out of neighborhoods.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, great job and I enjoyed reading your thoughts.